12 Angry Men

The first example of a illusion is when one of the jurors remarked that the virile child must be misdeedy because nobody rised antithetic . This is fundamentally an argument from ignorance because it makes an assumption based on no examinen facts . It argues that guilt is based on the failure to prove otherwise which is wrong from the point of view of logic and the lawThe manifest instance is when it is argued that one of the witnesses heard the accused scream I ll kill you despite the fact that there was a break roaring by . This is illogical because it would be extremely operose to hear from across the tracks when a train is passing byThe trio instance is when one of the jurors claims that you can t trust anything they say when referring to the good word of the defendant . The bigotry in this statement s prings from a error in relating certain stereo types with a certain heathen group . It is a fallacy because of the lack of sufficient can buoy for much(prenominal) statementThe fourth instance is when one of the jurors claims that when a soul says I ll kill you he means it . This was proven to be a fallacy when he is able to get the person to scream the same words later on This is a blueprint of a hasty generalization with no fag end at allThe fifth fallacy is when it is shown that the wound was downward all given the circumstances and the boy s proficiency with a break down knife knife , the wound would have to be upward(a) , opposed to what was found in the autopsy . This is another form of fallacy because it immediately assumes without verifying the veracity of the informationThe sixth fallacy is when the indignant juror states that all the evidence can be impel out because there was a woman who power saw him pluck the crime .

This is an example of an inconsistent fallacy because a ace witness does not necessarily prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt . There must be other evidence to support the testimonyThe seventh fallacy is when the enraged juror again argues that the person who saw the crime existence move might not have had her render on . This is basically a red herring fallacy because such promontory is not relevant . A person who ask spectacles to see would never claim to have seen anything if the glasses were not on the personThe eighth fallacy occurs when the housepainter juror states that motive is demand for the case . He states that If you don t have a motive , where s your case . This is an example of a false preference fallacy because the law has consistently held that motive is not the blush love in a murder case . It whitethorn be important but it is not absolutely essentialThe 9th fallacy occurs when the salesman with the baseball tickets states that What s there to talk about ? xi of us in here think...If you want to get a plenteous essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay